首页 >>12.2大陆雅思大作文7分范文及解析:商店禁止售卖不利于健康的食物
12.2大陆雅思大作文7分范文及解析:商店禁止售卖不利于健康的食物
发布来源: 雅思情报圈 发布时间:2021-12-03



情报圈的第462篇写作范文解析


观点类大作文,健康类话题


Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that have been scientifically proved to be bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?


题目来源:2021年12月2日大陆雅思大作文(重复2014年12月13日大陆考题)



1

题目大意

商店不得出售任何经证明对人体健康有害的食物和饮料。你是否同意?



2

思路解析

这是一道观点类考题,聊的是商店是否能够出售有害人体健康的食物。题目理解上不难,对人体有害的食物不一定是说这个食物有毒,诸如烟酒、膨化油炸食品其实都会对人体健康不利,审题时候需要注意关键词“should not be allowed to sell any food or drink”是个绝对化的表达,因此我们可以从反对角度切入,下面月半鸭和大家来看下具体观点。


一是关于什么食物不利于人体健康是缺乏明确定义的。一方面人们一旦过度食用某类食物和饮料对身体都是不利的,比如糖本身是人体必须摄入的,但是科学研究证明过度摄入糖分,结果也会导致身体某些指标的异常甚至引发肥胖等疾病。另一方面,当事人忽略自己自身条件的情况下,即使吃常人看来健康的食品,实际上也会对身体造成伤害,比如乳糖不耐受的人喝牛奶会导致腹泻,但因此将牛奶认定为对人体有害的食品似乎又不合理。


二是禁止这些食品和饮料在商店售卖会对经济造成不良影响,除了商店本身减少了可售商品的种类及销售额,这些食品的相关产业也会受到冲击,大量相关企业面临倒闭、企业员工面临失业问题,政府不仅需要考虑如何帮助相关人员再就业,同时这些企业的倒闭意味着相关税收也会减少,就比如香烟作为有害的食品但是能给政府带来丰厚的税收,一旦禁止其售卖,那背后的财政损失会难以弥补。



3

提纲

图片



4

高分范文示例

I shall argue in this essay how irrational the claim of voting the prohibition of selling food and beverage that are proved harmful to people would be. 


Before assessing whether those types of food intake should be forbidden or not, one should first make a clear definition of “harmful”. Anything that is eaten by people in their daily life may become “harmful” if without scientific eating amount or frequency. That means all food or beverage, nutritious or unhealthy, would somehow become toxic anyway if people blindly eat them without considering the physical situations. Therefore, I would say that one can never draw a clear line between regular catering materials and the so-called “harmful” food when there are no premises set on the quantity or eating frequency. Then is the impracticality of the supposed policy: how can we solely ban the selling of certain types of food only when they are relatively more “harmful” than others, but permit others that are less than harmful but would also be unhealthy under some circumstances? It is the ambiguity of the criteria towards these actions that compels me to reject this notion. 


Apart from the lack of credibility on the judgement of “harmfulness”, the given claim would also be unpersuasive because of its recklessness. This type of prohibition is practical only when its foreseeable contribution definitively outweighs the drawbacks it may provoke. Let alone how hardly the act can be implemented, the possible outcome of this is clearly dark and negative; it would certainly deprive certain catering industries of the ability of survival and would make the entire society face the sadness of unemployment. Companies related to, say, snacks, alcohol or soda, would immediately witness their fate of extinction and end up with corruption, sending a throng of fired employees into the talent market, who would suddenly increase the pressures pushed on the government and human resource departments. Whereas that is still not the whole story when lots of countries then realize that they would experience vicious slumps in their international trade, in which the old days' economic titans—coca-cola, KFC, burger king, Hennessy, etc.—would never make any money for their own countries, who would also not be that abundant to purchase inside the global importing and exporting chain. 


In conclusion, the absurdity and the calamities witness behind this notion make me strongly veto it and I certainly believe that feasibility and possible hazards should be meticulously testified before any prohibition of food and drinks, even if they may be seemingly harmful to our health. 



5

相关词汇和语法结构

Irrational 不合理的

Beverage 饮料

Nutritious 有营养的

Premise 前提

Impracticality 不现实性




注:本文系本站转载,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。如涉及作品内容、版权和其它问题,请与本站联系,我们将在第一时间删除内容!本文版权归原作者所有 内容为作者个人观点 本站只提供参考并不构成任何投资及应用建议。

关注我们

QQ:1229618612

邮箱:foxiielts@qq.com

帮你选课

查看更多>上海机构推荐